Resting state fMRI scanner instabilities revealed by longitudinal phantom scans in a multi-center study.

Quality assurance (QA) is crucial in longitudinal and/or multi-site studies, which involve the collection of data from a group of subjects over time and/or at different locations. It is important to regularly monitor the performance of the scanners over time and at different locations to detect and control for intrinsic differences (e.g., due to manufacturers) and changes in scanner performance (e.g., due to gradual component aging, software and/or hardware upgrades, etc.). As part of the Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative (ONDRI) and the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND), QA phantom scans were conducted approximately monthly for three to four years at 13 sites across Canada with 3T research MRI scanners. QA parameters were calculated for each scan using the functional Biomarker Imaging Research Network's (fBIRN) QA phantom and pipeline to capture between- and within-scanner variability. We also describe a QA protocol to measure the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) of slice-wise point spread functions (PSF), used in conjunction with the fBIRN QA parameters. Variations in image resolution measured by the FWHM are a primary source of variance over time for many sites, as well as between sites and between manufacturers. We also identify an unexpected range of instabilities affecting individual slices in a number of scanners, which may amount to a substantial contribution of unexplained signal variance to their data. Finally, we identify a preliminary preprocessing approach to reduce this variance and/or alleviate the slice anomalies, and in a small human data set show that this change in preprocessing can have a significant impact on seed-based connectivity measurements for some individual subjects. We expect that other fMRI centres will find this approach to identifying and controlling scanner instabilities useful in similar studies.

Electronic Sleep Stage Classifiers: A Survey and VLSI Design Methodology.

First, existing sleep stage classifier sensors and algorithms are reviewed and compared in terms of classification accuracy, level of automation, implementation complexity, invasiveness, and targeted application. Next, the implementation of a miniature microsystem for low-latency automatic sleep stage classification in rodents is presented. The classification algorithm uses one EMG (electromyogram) and two EEG (electroencephalogram) signals as inputs in order to detect REM (rapid eye movement) sleep, and is optimized for low complexity and low power consumption. It is implemented in an on-board low-power FPGA connected to a multi-channel neural recording IC, to achieve low-latency (order of 1 ms or less) classification. Off-line experimental results using pre-recorded signals from nine mice show REM detection sensitivity and specificity of 81.69% and 93.86%, respectively, with the maximum latency of 39 [Formula: see text]. The device is designed to be used in a non-disruptive closed-loop REM sleep suppression microsystem, for future studies of the effects of REM sleep deprivation on memory consolidation.